Open Source Initiative blogs http://opensource.org/blog en Declare victory and go home http://opensource.org/node/335 Sometimes I want to declare victory and go home. Of course, that's usually an admission of defeat, but I really think that with news like <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/15/verizon_embraces_linux/">Verizon Embraces Linux</a>, that the penetration of Open Source into every sector of computer-using society (which would be ... everything) is inevitable. We've started the snowball down the hill, and there's no stopping it. Not that we would want to! But neither can the foes of Open Source stop it either. http://opensource.org/node/335#comment Thu, 15 May 2008 09:52:07 -0700 nelson 335 at http://opensource.org Report from CSEE&T Meeting, April 2008 http://opensource.org/node/334 <p>Last month I was honored to be a <a href="http://www.csc2.ncsu.edu/conferences/cseet/keynotes.php#tiemann">keynote speaker</a> at the <a href="http://www.csc2.ncsu.edu/conferences/cseet/">Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training</a> (CSEE&amp;T) annual meeting. Open Source has become a major topic on campuses, not just the enterprise, and I was delighted to meet with some of the leaders in setting the agenda for software engineering education.</p> <p>When I was a student in the <a href="http://www.seas.upenn.edu/under/">School of Engineering and Applied Science</a> at the <a href="http://upenn.edu/">University of Pennsylvania</a>, I did not give to much thought about how the faculty chose to teach <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Computer_Programming">Sorting and Searching</a> and not <a href="http://www.dummies.com/WileyCDA/DummiesTitle/DOS-For-Dummies-3rd-Edition.productCd-0764503618.html">DOS for Idiots</a> or why the core curriculum was constructed in one way and not another. At the time it all seemed like useful and exciting stuff to me, and I learned it all (as best I could).</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/334">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/334#comment Wed, 07 May 2008 08:15:54 -0700 Michael Tiemann 334 at http://opensource.org Web 2.0 doesn't imply usability http://opensource.org/node/333 <p>I recently got myself a <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/russnelson/">Flickr Pro account</a>, and have been using Flickr for more of my photos. I find myself more and more annoyed at the rough edges in the Flickr user interface. For example, when you want to delete a tag from something, you click on the [x] to the right of the tag. Flickr asks you "Do you want to delete the tag?" Cancel/Ok:<p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/333">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/333#comment Sat, 03 May 2008 21:57:39 -0700 nelson 333 at http://opensource.org I just won a $300 bet http://opensource.org/node/332 <p>For the past several years I've printed various documents at home by sending them to my wife Amy with a request "Please print...". And after several years we both know that Adobe Acrobat version 5 for Mac works far, far better than any subsequent release from Apple or Adobe, at least for the pdf documents I create on Linux. But how crazy is it that I don't have my own printer?</p> <p>Last weekend I found myself at Staples and I decided to make a $300 bet with myself that I could get good value from an Epson Stylus Photo 1400 printer (with a maximum format size of 13"x19" borderless prints).</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/332">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/332#comment Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:52:43 -0700 Michael Tiemann 332 at http://opensource.org config.h considered harmful http://opensource.org/node/331 <p>Many, many programs written in C or C++ use a file called "config.h" which contains #define statement that control the compilation of the program. These programs are also nearly always built using 'make'.</p> <p>I claim that these two attributes are in conflict with each other. Or, in layman's terms, "config.h sucks". The problem is that when you have multiple options in config.h, every file which may be compiled differently depending on the values defined therein must be recompiled whenever config.h changes.</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/331">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/331#comment Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:04:45 -0700 nelson 331 at http://opensource.org Open Source Awards 2008 http://opensource.org/node/330 The Open Source Initiative ran the first Open Source Awards, but when we dropped them, Google and O'Reilly picked up the idea (yay!). <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/04/open-source-award-nominations.html">Nominations are currently open</a>, but close in a few short weeks. http://opensource.org/node/330#comment Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:25:41 -0700 nelson 330 at http://opensource.org You need more than free rocks http://opensource.org/node/329 <p>We're realizing is that Open Source is more than just free software. Free software is like free rocks. You need rocks, but rocks aren't enough to build a house. You get the Open Source effect only when you have a pyramid of people (roles, actually -- you can still get the Open Source effect if one person fulfills all these roles) associated with the project:<br /> <code><br /> / Editors \<br /> / Developers \<br /> / Contributors \<br /> / Contributors \<br /> / Users, Users \<br /> / Users, Users, Users \<br /> </code><br /> The Editors decide what goes into a project and what falls on the floor. Developers write the code. Contributors write documentation, answer questions, report bugs, blog about the software, review the software, and do everything else which isn't coding. Users just use the code, but of course the role of user is why everybody else does what they do.</p> <p>Together, these people form a community.</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/329">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/329#comment Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:00:44 -0700 nelson 329 at http://opensource.org Damn disheartening news from OLPC http://opensource.org/node/328 <p>The subtitle of <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9079798">this Computer World report</a> quotes Nicholas Negroponte as saying that insitence on Open Source scares people away.</p> <p>Boggle.</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/328">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/328#comment Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:05:21 -0700 Michael Tiemann 328 at http://opensource.org Zak Greant's OSI Weekly Report 2008 Week 13/14 http://opensource.org/node/326 <p>This report is a summary of <a href="http://zak.greant.com">Zak Greant</a>'s Open Source Initiative activities for the weeks of March 30th to April 5th and April 6th to 12th, 2008.</p> <p><strong>These Weeks</strong></p> <ul> <li>Light OSI community service work (mostly answering private queries on mailing lists, discussing OSI issues at Go Open, etc.)</li> <li>Dropped the ball on the RfP - just got too busy.</li> <li>Keynote at <a href="http://goopen.no">Go Open</a> in Oslo, Norway</li> </ul> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/326">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/326#comment Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:48:30 -0700 zak 326 at http://opensource.org Study: ~50% of Norwegian Software Vendors Integrate FOSS Components http://opensource.org/node/325 <blockquote> <p>... based on an extensive screening of software companies, with more than 700 responses. </p> <p>Analysis shows that close to 50% of the software industry integrate OSS components into vertical solutions serving all major business sectors. </p> <p>In addition, more than 30% of the companies using OSS components have over 40% of their income from OSS related services or software. </p> <p>...</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/325">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/325#comment Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:20:45 -0700 zak 325 at http://opensource.org